Book of daniel dating

He predicted that the Messiah would come to Jerusalem in about AD 30, as well as predicting the destruction of Jerusalem shortly afterward. That being true, then it is quite obvious that the book’s claim that the visions were recorded by Daniel himself must be true.

It is illogical to think that a God-inspired book is in fact a forgery.

While modern critics hold to this perspective, there are a number of reasons for believing in the biblical authorship of Daniel: . If Daniel wasn’t historical, then Jesus was either lying, or he was ignorant. However, Ezekiel places Daniel alongside Noah and Job (Ezek. By contrast, Daniel—the son of Aqhat—from Pagan mythology was a Baal worshipper!

Jesus said, “You [will] see the abomination of desolation which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet” (Mt. Here Jesus believed Daniel was a real person, who was a “prophet.” As Jesus said this, the Temple was still standing, so he trusted that Daniel’s future prediction would come to fruition. Why would Ezekiel refer to this man as a hero of faith?

the triumph of Greece)."Though these dreams and visions all concern events in the future, there is considerable variation both in the timescale involved and in the scope of the events predicted. ""Quite apart from the historicity of the figure of Daniel, the authenticity of the book had already been questioned by the 3d century Neoplatonist philosopher Porphyry.

Some dreams predict events for the immediate future, some for the more distant future, and some for the very distant future. According to the relation of his opinions by Jerome (who spent much of his commentary on Daniel refuting Porphyry's arguments), Porphyry contended that the remarkably accurate "predictions" contained in Daniel (esp. 11) were the result of a pious fraud, perpetrated by some zealous propagandist of the Maccabean movement, who wished to encourage a spirit of heroism among the Jewish patriots resisting Antiochus IV. We are informed by Jerome that: "Porphyry wrote his twelfth book against the prophecy of Daniel, denying that it was composed by the person to whom it is ascribed in its title, but rather by some individual living in Judaea at the time of that Antiochus who was surnamed Epiphanes; he further alleged that 'Daniel' did not foretell the future so much as he related the past, and lastly that whatever he spoke of up till the time of Antiochus contained authentic history, whereas anything he may have conjectured beyond that point was false, inasmuch as he would not have foreknown the future.""As to the date of the composition of Daniel, the narrative of the prophet's earliest experiences begins with his capture as a hostage by Nebuchadnezzar back in 605-604 B. and according to continues certainly till the first year of Cyrus (c. C.), in relation to his public service, and to the third year of Cyrus (535 B.

The evidence of the language of the book leads to the conclusion that it was written in the fifth century BC plus or minus a century. In other words, the Aramaic and Hebrew in the book, according to the experts, is from somewhere between roughly 350 and 600 BC. Only the liberals who have a preconceived notion give a later date, but when I look at their arguments their bias is so obvious it can be discounted. This includes the inclusion of Daniel in the Greek Septuagint translation (made by about 180 BC, and probably earlier) as well as the discovery of fragements of Daniel in the Dead Sea Scrolls.

The first six chapters contain the popular stories of the Burning Fiery Furnace, Belshazzar’s Feast, and the Lions’ Den.The evidence just mentioned is absolutely convincing to me, but for the skeptic, more direct evidence is required.Outside of the predictive prophecies, which seem without question to point to inspiration and therefore authorship by Daniel, the other evidence for an early date of writing for Daniel do not absolutely push it back into the sixth century.He also believed Daniel predicted his future second coming accurately (Mt. In context, Ezekiel 14 denounces paganism and idolatry.Moreover, in Ezekiel 28:3, we read, “You are wiser than Daniel; there is no secret that is a match for you.” This is a clear reference to Daniel 1 and 2, where the prophet Daniel is able have wisdom in interpreting Nebuchadnezzar’s dreams, when all of the false prophets were unable to do this.

Leave a Reply